Digital Commons vs. ContentDM

I've gotten this question 2 or 3 times now, fellow archivist/librarians, debating over whether to go with Digital Commons or ContentDM. My answer in brief is that I went with Digital Commons because it is so much easier to work with. ContentDM is quite labor intensive, you have to do things just so, per the thesaurus etc. Digital Commons does what we need to do, and does it easier... (This most recent query was from someone at University of the Pacific.)